Correct me if I'm wrong, but won't that turn out horrible, to shrink an image from 4000000px to 10000px? Well, I'd just create 2 images, one wallpaper sized image for the background art on the youtube, and one smaller 256x256 for the thumbnail image.If possible have the size of the art 2000px by 2000px. Just remember that it should still be able to look good shrunk down to 100px by 100px.
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Nine Volt wrote:Did you steal that name from that short-lived challenge project a while ago? I think you did.
:3
Alycs wrote:So, are you looking for a full album piece or a logo; because the last part makes it sound like you want a logo. I can do both if you want (I have some free time so why not)
Alycs wrote:So, are you looking for a full album piece or a logo; because the last part makes it sound like you want a logo. I can do both if you want (I have some free time so why not)
And at itroitnyah: Not at all, in graphic design you do it all the time. I frequently color stuff at near 20,000px then shrink it down when I'm done. That being said, yes, I would still create two images, because websites usually just use brute-force-compression to resize things, making stuff look terrible.
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Camsy wrote:That's pretty cool! Oh, but can you get rid of the 'Camsy' part? At this point I'd rather just have 'The Wonderbeats' on the album. ^.^
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Freewave wrote:being too critical can make you too critical
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests