by the4thImpulse » 18 Dec 2012 13:00
(I am posting this in the music section as I believe it will be most helpful here, I would be ideal to have this stickied at the top)
After reading Navrons “How many of you are actually dedicated to music?” thread it seems to me some people are a little uncomfortable with giving people feedback for numerous reasons. I want to show you that it doesn’t take much to give worthwhile feedback, and in doing so I hope you are more encouraged to give feedback to your fellow musicians.
First off I will give my definition of ‘worthwhile/constructive feedback. Feedback is criticism, there needs to be some meat in your response that is helpful for the producer. Just saying “nice track, you’re cool” and leaving it there is not at all helpful for the artist looking to get better, yes it’s encouraging and it’s a good thing to say but it’s not helpful feedback. Proper feedback should be, more or less, a list of the parts of the track that, to your ears, did not sound right/good. Again it’s not simply “your bass sucks”, it needs to contain your reasoning so the producer knows you’re not just trolling around. Write as much as you can, no short answers, put time into it and you both will benefit.
In short, feedback needs substance and it needs to be helpful.
To be clear if you are in the position where you cannot find anything wrong with the track to your ears, then be sure to write exactly that, example: “Awesome track, love the melody! I have nothing in the way of criticism/tips to offer because it’s so good!”. That shows you really listened well and could not find flaws worth noting which is far better than leaving it at “cool track”.
Now what does it take to give constructive feedback? Well sure, having the ability to tear apart someone’s mix and give a full report on everything that works and doesn’t work takes a long time to master and a good set of trained ears. But I don’t believe you need any of that to be simply helpful! To start all you need to do is listen, really listen to the track and try to pinpoint all the different frequencies and instruments (or various synths). If you don’t like the way something sounds try to examine why that may be, it’s hard at first but just keep listening and listening. If you can get this far (finding something that doesn’t sound right) then that’s what you should write to be helpful for the producer. Even “the bass does not sound quite right when the lead synth plays” is far better than nothing. Just saying what you didn’t like or what you thought sounded ‘off’ is good feedback and you just need to listen and use your ears to do it.
Other kinds of good feedback: telling the produce what you would do/change in the track. Give them some ideas to work with, If you like one part but not another tell them how you might make it better or if you might remove it. Don’t be mean obviously, putting it in words like “I like the lead synth but it’s a little bland, maybe try adding some sparkly reverb” is helpful and doesn’t (usually) come across as mean spirited.
Examples of bad/not helpful feedback: (these are real quotes from various forums)
- “The main groove like before the breakdown is super hot. That clap is bad ass. Where'd you get it?”
- “Unreal sound. Does not feel 7mins long. In a good way! Keep up the work”
- “I like this” (yes, that’s all they wrote…)
Examples of good/helpful feedback: (again taken from various forums)
- “I think the synth before the reverb kicks in sounds like the birthday song, so might want tot do something about that. For the second drop, I do like the little laser-like stab that comes in but its a little rough, it cuts in a lot. Try to filter/EQ it a bit to have it fit in better.”
- “I agree, the drums bang but somethings off with the melody, I think a couple elements are out of key or something, also I think the track could be mixed better, keep working at it bro practice makes perfect.”
- “Interesting track!, Your drums are very prominent. Mixing seems good except a couple spots could use some volume reductions as I hear some crushing. specifically around 1:11 ish.
All in all dope track man! Keep up the good work!”
- “Hey, this is a pretty good EP. I'm not even a huge metalcore fan, but it's great to hear good music from new artists. I don't really know what kind of critique I could give here, just keep up the good work!”
- “Wow. This is fantastic and everything is near perfect. But the one thing I have to complain about is those buildups. One quiet as hell upriser and then out of nowhere a sample. The buildup needs some drum rolls, white noise, extra synth, just something to make them more epic. That's really about it though. Oh yeah, and don't forget that downlifter at the drop to make it sound bigger.”
A common trait between the two is their length; learn to write a short paragraph per track you’re providing feedback for. Do your best to use proper English skills, its only helpful but I understand if it’s hard for various reasons (I personally have problems with language skills so I am very understanding but some people are not).
Finally on receiving feedback, be sure to say at the very least “thank you for the feedback”. If you do not reply after people have given you feedback then please don’t post more songs asking for more, it personally makes me sad, and it shows me you have no respect towards the community here/anywhere.
More importantly no one is trying to intentionally offend you, and in the rare chance they are they will be very obvious about it. If someone says “its needs a lot more work in the mix down, the synths don’t complement each other, needs more work before you should release it” to the track you’ve worked on for countless hours over the last two months, than please don’t respond with any hatred towards the poster. They are only trying to help. Realize that everyone hears things differently and some people may hear what to them are ‘problems’ but to you how it’s supposed to sound’. If that’s the case and you can’t find it in yourself to work with the person providing feedback than just say and go on with your life, no need to start arguments over such petty issues.
Some people will have ‘trained/experienced’ ears and will be able to show you flaws you may not even notice at first, if that’s the case than please first try to see what they are trying to show you. Try to listen for what they are pointing out and if you still can’t hear, again, don’t make a big deal about it, say “I can’t hear what your hearing, could you be more specific?”. Let them explain as clearly as they can before you ignore/hate them for their pinion on your track.
There are a few of us here that can and will completely rip apart your track and create extensive lists of everything you can do better. We, of all people, are trying to help, we want to show you exactly what you should focus your ears on so you can learn and grow as a musician. We aren’t saying your music sucks because we list these ‘flaws’ we are showing where you can do better. If you don’t know where to improve your music then how can you become a better musician?
The most common users here (at the time of this writing) that often provide accurate details like this are Lavender, Navron, Kyoga, and myself. When we post none of us are hating on you or your music, we just want you to be the best you can.
These are only guidelines, I’m sure some of you will disagree with some of what I wrote, and I had no intention of offending anyone with this thread. This is not directed at any one person either, just something to help those of you that may struggle with giving constructive feedback.
Last edited by
the4thImpulse on 11 Jan 2013 13:30, edited 1 time in total.