ExoBassTix wrote:That's Dubstep how I like it.
I'm sad that it's not that popular anymore.
Digital Mystikz. THEY make Dubstep. Real Dubstep.
eery wrote:Facade wrote:it seems the name dubstep has been raped by 12 year old kiddies we need a new word for music thats focused on sub bass lines and syncopated drum and percussion patterns :/
Please stop being an eltist cunt. We get it. You dont like the nu dubstep. Shut up. Please.
Facade wrote:r*ped
Placing my tongue on the GR meter to taste the gain reduction I some how improved my skills.
Facade wrote:i wasn't using it lightly its true that's what they basically did to the word
edit:
i also meant this defenition
"an act of plunder, violent seizure, or abuse; despoliation; violation"
not the other one
sorry if you where offended by my words as that wasn't my intent
Facade wrote:eery wrote:Facade wrote:it seems the name dubstep has been raped by 12 year old kiddies we need a new word for music thats focused on sub bass lines and syncopated drum and percussion patterns :/
Please stop being an eltist cunt. We get it. You dont like the nu dubstep. Shut up. Please.
i never said i hate it i just dont like the word people use to describe it. also 'merica bitch
Lying Pink wrote:We've been lying all this time. None of us listen to anything except for lowercase, free jazz, xenharmonic new complexity and power electronics. Anything less is pleb tier - new-style and old-style dubstep alike.
You forgot IDM and Illbient. Only the finest genres shall touch these ears.
But seriously while i do agree that dubstep can exist for both audiences and under the same name it does frustrate me that Americans made dubstep a noisy, white, dumb thing out of something that was a dubby, atmospheric, black thing. It seemed to have a lot more class back before it was brought over but it likely was a lot less fun to dance to. It would have been great if it had a genre name change vs TRYING to keep it the same (and get eternal whining from the old schoolers) but that's not how it happened and we gotta move out of that tired argument someday.
Navron wrote:Rock today shouldn't be called rock because it's not like the rock of the 70s and 80s. Back then rock bands actually focused on creating good songs. Not rock ripoff bands like Nirvana and Alice in Chains that took good music and made it into a bunch of noise and distortion.
Genres evolve guys. The whole reason today's dubstep was called dubstep is because it still contained a similar bpm and two step drum pattern. The only thing that initially changed was the bass, moving from a subbass only frequency, to a subbass with more audible mid-range frequencies. From there it just became heavier and heavier, so the sub-genre may have changed, but the root genre is still dubstep. For example, Nirvana and Alice in Chains are part of the grunge subgenre, but their root genre is still rock. Does that mean their music falls under the same definition as rock in its earliest form? No. It's quite unlike rock in its original form.
Gettin rather sick of the elistist dubstep crowd. Yes, there are plenty of kiddies making crappy dubstep tunes in the laziest way possible with modern talking, but there's also plenty of teenage rock bands that make really crappy pop punk bullsh**. Doesn't mean every artist in the "brostep" genre is a talentless hack, and to be quite honest, many of the forefront artists of "brostep," display quite a bit of talent in sound design.
If you don't think brostep has any skill in sound design, I will wait for your awesome and "easily created" brostep track that rivals the sound design of somebody like Excision.
ExoBassTix wrote:Exactly. Even though I dislike it personally, I don't hate it, but my god, separate Dubstep and Brostep already.
itroitnyah wrote:They're the same genre and just because they're different styles of the same genre doesn't mean they need to be categorized differently. Go read Navron's post above.
PYR3LIGHT wrote:I call for subdivisions of dubstep the same way there are with house, etc. Because there are tons of different styles of dubstep that sound different. Omni, Skrillex, Rusko, Excision. All (often) make dubstep, all sound different. At this point its kinda like saying "dream house isn't real house because it doesn't sound like French house".
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests