by Navron » 01 Apr 2012 09:40
No offense, but I wouldn't be surprised if many people aren't interested, and here's why:
Part of a collaboration involves the 2 or more musicians to combine their creative talents and make something new. It's a benefit to both musicians because they get to see what kind of sound they can come up with together.
I've been looking at possibly doing a collaboration, and your post actually turned me off. Let's forget the huge paragraph and grammatical errors (just an eyesore,) and look at the way you've worded it:
- "it's goin to be a tree way collab."
- "it's goin to be me aka royalpony5300, mainly, and (who ever wats to join)."
- "the track will be named, "royalpony5300 ft. mainly, (any pony that joins)"
- "also this track is goin to be a ten minute track"
- "and it's goin to be a hardstyle track."
Your entire post is basically saying, "I've made up my mind about everything on this song, and want some names to go along with it."
When you word something and use a lot of "wills" and "it's goin to be," you're taking charge and asserting yourself as the lead person, which is good for certain collabs, but bad when you start picking exactly how long, what style, what title, etc, because that limits the artistic freedom of the artists you're collaborating with, with defeats the whole purpose of a collaboration.
Just trying to help you out here.
DAW: Cubase 6.5, Ableton Live 8
Preferred Genre: Industrial/Trance
Hardware: Schecter Diamond Series Bass, Yamaha Acoustic Guitar, BP355 Effects Pedal, Keystudio 49K Keyboard, Akai APC40, Korg nanoKEY2 25k Keyboard